|
Compliance with the provisions
of the Combined Code
The Company complied with all the provisions set out in Section 1 of the
Combined Code throughout the year.
Application of the principles
set out in the Combined Code
In this report, the heading to each of the principles is set out and the
manner in which the Company has applied the principle underlying each
of the headings is described.
The Board
The Company has a Board comprising an independent non-executive Chairman,
three executive directors and three independent non-executive directors.
The senior non-executive director is Michael Hartnall.
Chairman and Group Chief
Executive
The Company has both a Chairman and a Group Chief Executive. There is
a clear division of responsibility between the two positions with the
Chairman responsible for running the Board and the Group Chief Executive
responsible for running the Group’s businesses. Major decisions have to
be made by the Board as a whole and no one individual has unfettered powers
of decision.
Board balance
The Board has both executive and independent non-executive directors.
Each director has a vote and no individual or small group of individuals
dominates the Board’s decision taking.
Supply of information
to the Board
The Board normally meets ten times a year and considers at each meeting
a report from the Group Chief Executive on current trading and major business
issues. The Board also considers reports from various heads of corporate
functions on a regular basis and agrees the operating plan for the following
financial year.
Appointments to the Board
There is a Nominations Committee of the Board which comprises all the
independent non-executive directors and is chaired by the Chairman of
the Company. This Committee nominates appointments to the Board, actual
appointments being made by the Board as a whole.
Re-election of directors
One third of the directors retire each year and submit themselves for
reelection at the Annual General Meeting of the Company. Reelection of
an individual director therefore falls at least every three years. The
directors retiring by rotation at the next Annual General Meeting are
Jonathan Fry and George Fairweather.
Philip Brown and Rick McNeel were appointed directors on 28 July 2000
and submit themselves for election at the Annual General Meeting.
The level and make-up
of directors’ remuneration and disclosure
The level and make-up of remuneration is set out in the Board report on
remuneration. As that Report shows, a proportion of executive directors’
remuneration is linked to corporate performance through both the Performance
Share Plan and the annual bonus scheme.
Procedure on executive
remuneration
There is a Remuneration Committee of the Board which is more fully described
in the Board report on remuneration. The responsibilities of the Committee
include the determination of (i) the Company’s policy on remuneration
of executive directors and (ii) the specific remuneration in all its forms
and all other terms of service of executive directors. No director is
involved in deciding their own remuneration.
Dialogue with institutional
shareholders
Directors of the Company are in contact from time to time with representatives
of institutional shareholders to discuss matters of mutual interest relating
to the Company.
Constructive use of the
Annual General Meeting
The Board uses the Annual General Meeting (AGM) as an occasion to communicate
with all shareholders, including private investors, who are provided with
the opportunity to ask questions relating to the Group. The notice of
the AGM to be held on 26 April 2001 and related papers will be posted
to shareholders more than 20 working days before the AGM.
Financial reporting
The directors have acknowledged, in the Directors’ responsibilities statement,
their responsibility for preparing the financial statements of the Company
and the Group. The auditors have included, in the independent auditors’
report, a statement about their reporting responsibilities.
The directors are also responsible for the publication of unaudited interim
reports of the Group which provide balanced and understandable assessments
of the Group’s financial position for the first six months of each accounting
period. The same standards are applied to other price sensitive public
reports and reports to regulators, as well as to information provided
to satisfy statutory requirements.
Going concern
After making appropriate enquiries, the directors have a reasonable expectation
that the Company and Group have adequate resources to continue in operational
existence for the foreseeable future. For this reason they continue to
adopt the going concern basis in preparing the financial statements.
Internal control
The Board has overall responsibility for the Group’s system of internal
control and risk management and for reviewing the effectiveness of this
system. Such a system can only be designed to manage, rather than eliminate,
the risk of failure to achieve business objectives and can therefore only
provide reasonable, and not absolute, assurance against material misstatement
or loss.
The Board is of the view that an ongoing process for identifying, evaluating
and managing significant risks faced by the Group was in place throughout
2000 and up to the date that the Annual Report 2000 was approved. This
process is regularly reviewed by the Board and accords with the internal
control guidance for directors as required by the Combined Code.
During 1999, a risk management committee was established to enhance
management’s ability to review and monitor the effectiveness of this process
on a regular basis. The terms of reference of the committee included establishing
and implementing policies and procedures for risk management and internal
controls and allocating responsibility for business risk management. They
also include the ongoing monitoring of the effectiveness of internal controls.
Businesses are required to include internal controls on agendas for
their regular management meetings and to report half yearly to the risk
management committee on actions taken to review the effectiveness of those
controls. Businesses are also required to have processes to identify risks
and, so far as possible, take action to reduce those risks.
At the meeting held in December 2000, the Board carried out its annual
review of the effectiveness of internal controls. This included considering
a report from the risk management committee on action taken during the
year to identify and reduce risks and to increase awareness of both risk
management and the importance of having effective internal controls.
Audit Committee and Auditors
The Audit Committee comprises the Chairman and all non-executive directors.
The Committee meets at least three times a year to review, inter alia,
in conjunction with the external and internal auditors, internal financial
controls within the Group. The Committee operates under written terms
of reference and its duties include a detailed review of the financial
statements prior to their recommendation to the Board for approval.
The duties of the Audit Committee include keeping under review the scope
and results of the external audit, its cost effectiveness and the independence
and objectivity of external auditors.
|